TACT Home Leadership Directory Media Relations Legislative Info First Alerts TX Gov't Links
About TACT Conferences Members Only eBulletin Join TACT Now! E-mail Us

 

Texas Association of College Teachers
Serving Educators Since 1948


1996 TACT Archives

Oct 24,1996
Sep 17, 1996


December 2

Congratulations to the 89 "New" TACT members and the many devoted TACT 
leaders who made the 1997 Fall Membership Drive so successful!

Statewide membership is greater that it has been for many years. Particular 
kudos extend to Texas A&M Univ.-Kingsville (and chapter president Jim 
Puckett), Midwestern State University (and chapter president Ruth Morrow), 
and Lamar University at Beaumont -- just three of the chapters who have 
grown through this membership blitz.

The largest regional increase during this Membership Drive goes to the South 
Central Region with an increase of 27 members (Texas A&M-Kingsville can 
claim 20 of those since October 31.)

Also due credit are the chapter leaders who use the monthly membership 
reports to retain their members who may have forgotten to renew (note: 82 
members statewide will be dropped from the membership rosters if they are 
not contacted before March 1, 1998.)


October 24th



                        TACT Legislative First Alert
                              October 24, 1997


The House Higher Education Committee has met the past two days in interim 
hearings. Much of the message was consistent with remarks we heard during 
the TACT Conference from Representative Henry Cuellar and Commissioner Don 
Brown regarding approaches to educational access in light of the Hopwood 
decision. 

UT Chancellor Cunningham announced two commissions to address methods of 
ensuring a diverse student body. The more high visibility of the two 
includes such notables as Wilhelmina Delco, William Hobby, Annette Strauss 
and Ron Kirk. 

The full six charges of the interim committee are:

#1 - CHARGE ON HOPWOOD

Review the effects of the Hopwood decision and the responses to the decision 
by institutions of higher learning, including professional schools. Monitor 
the implementation of HB 588 and policies of the Texas Higher Education 
Coordinating Board, and assess the impacts of such measures.   CHAIR: Rep. 
Irma Rangel, Committee on Higher Education

#2 - CHARGE ON ENROLLMENT INCREASES

Determine the adequacy of the plans of institutions of higher education and 
the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to accommodate projected 
enrollment increases over the next two decades. Determine the adequacy and 
cost effectiveness of the plans. Examine the contributions expected of 
non-traditional methods, such as reducing the number of years to degree, 
distance learning and multi-institutional learning arrangements.  CHAIR: 
Rep. Irma Rangel, Committee on Higher Education

#3 - CHARGE ON EDUCATION FUNDING

Review the use of special funds in higher education, including funds for the 
"back-to-basics" initiative, to ensure that they are used effectively and 
appropriately. Evaluate the success of the recently implemented higher 
education funding formula.  CHAIR: Rep. Henry Cuellar, Subcommittee on 
Education Funding

#4 - CHARGE ON EDUCATION COST

Study the trend in cost of a post-secondary education, financial aid, and 
family incomes; evaluate the effects on access to higher learning by persons 
of all socio-economic levels.  CHAIR: Rep. Jim Solis, Subcommittee on 
Education Costs

#5 - CHARGE ON THE WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY

Review the Western Governors University initiative and assess its potential 
value for Texas institutions.  CHAIR:  Rep. Elvira Reyna, Subcommittee on 
the Western Governors University

#6 - CHARGE ON AGENCY OVERSIGHT & FINANCIAL AID PROGRAMS

Conduct active oversight of agencies under the committee's jurisdiction, 
including a review of the State Auditor's finding of material weakness in 
higher education administration of student financial aid programs.  CHAIR: 
Rep. Henry Cuellar, Subcommittee on Agency Oversight & Financial Aid Programs


October 8th

For Immediate Release	

From:	Chuck Hempstead
	512-873-7404



                        TACT to Celebrate 50th Anniversary


	The Texas Association of College Teachers (TACT) will celebrate its 50th 
year of operation when faculty leaders from across the state convene at the 
Four Points Hotel October 17 and 18 in Austin. 
	"This is exciting yet humbling," said the association's president, Tom 
Hoffman, an associate professor of English at Midwestern State University.  
"As the oldest, largest and most successful faculty advocacy organization in 
Texas, it is certainly appropriate that we pause to reflect upon and 
appreciate the contributions of the people who have made Texas higher 
education among the best in the world."
	TACT represents more than 33,000 faculty, librarians, professional staff, 
researchers and administrators on 34 campuses of Texas' senior public 
colleges and universities.  It originated in 1948 as a section of the Texas 
State Teachers Association (TSTA) and was called the College Classroom 
Teachers Association (CCTA).  In 1956, the name was changed when TACT 
disaffiliated from TSTA.  
	Friday afternoon and evening highlights of the conference include an 
address by State Representative Henry Cuellar, a panel discussion on faculty 
interests relative to distance learning technologies and a presentation by 
Dr. Don Brown, the new Commissioner of the Texas Higher Education 
Coordinating Board. 
	"I am particularly looking forward to the 4:00 PM session," President 
Hoffman said, "when we will distribute a thirty-six page history of the 
successes of TACT.  Many past presidents will be in attendance, and it will 
be fun to hear how this organization has contributed to faculty welfare over 
the decades."

                                #   #   #




September 24th

                    

Frequently, legislative success is a result of the goodwill developed over a 
long period of time through effective community relations.  That is why 
TACT's primary initiative for 1998 will be public relations.  To learn more 
about how you can contribute to a better positive public image of 
professionals in higher education, attend the TACT House of Delegates 
Meeting October 18 in Austin. For hotel registration contact the Four Points 
Hotel at 512-836-8520 and use the Group Code "TACT" or call the State Office 
for assistance at 512-873-7404.


September 23rd


Yesterday's Dallas Morning News included a guest editorial by Representative 
Ted Kamel outlining his H.B. 1404 which deregulated long-distance education 
in Texas.  Kamel wrote that his "(Texas Colleges On-Line will) never replace 
the traditional classroom environment, nor should it."  

The new provision permits any Coordinating Board-approved class to be 
offered electronically without the previous requirement of separate 
Coordinating Board approval.  Traditional tuition will be charged.  For 
further information on this legislation, technology and effect on faculty, 
plan to attend the TACT Fall Conference October 17 and 18 in Austin.





September 2nd


For Immediate Release:
Chuck Hempstead
512-873-7404


                "TACT President Chosen for Study Committee"


Dr. Thomas Hoffman, president of the Texas Association of College Teachers  
(TACT) and associate professor of English at Midwestern State University, 
has been named to the Formula Study Committee of the Texas Higher Education 
Coordinating Board.

The Formula Study Committee is convened at the request of the Texas 
Legislature to recommend changes to the procedure by which colleges and 
universities receive state funding. 

"One of the reasons I pursued this appointment, " Hoffman said, "was that 
Midwestern is one of only four public universities in Texas not associated 
with a system like the UT, A&M and State systems.  We want to make sure 
that the independents are well represented.  Additionally, I will be 
wearing my hat as TACT president to assure that our human resources -- the 
faculty and staff -- don't continue to lose ground to the rest of the 
nation on compensation issues."

The Texas Association of College Teachers is preparing to celebrate its 
50th year as the primary advocate for faculty, librarian and professional 
staff personnel issues.


                                #   #   # 


August 25th

                          
We told you last week that the Lt. Governor is beginning to announce his 
interim committee charges.  Specifically, the Senate Finance 
Subcommittee on Education is Mike Moncrief (chair), Buster Brown and 
Judith Zaffirini. They will:

1. Evaluate the usefulness of the institutions' performance measures;

2. Analyze the institutions' accuracy in reporting on performance measures;

3. Evaluate institutions' budgets and identify reasons for differences in 
budget requests and appropriated amounts;

4. Examine the history of institutions' unexpended balances and the causes 
for those balances;

5. Evaluate institutions' caseload, population or enrollment forecast methods;

6. Monitor institutions'  responses to State Auditor reports;

7. Analyze institutions' line-item strategies and determine if they are 
essential to and reflective of the institutions' missions;

8. Review increases and decreases in the number of institutions' full or 
part-time employees and use of consultant/contract individuals; and

9. Evaluate all judgment, settlement agreements, and pending legal claims, 
whether or not asserted in a lawsuit, which will or may impact institutions; 
FY '98-2001 budget periods. 

Additionally, Senators Bill Ratliff and Teel Bivins will cochair a special 
committee to look at funding issues in higher education and public schools. 
The committee also includes Senators Robert Duncan, Greg Luna, David Sibley, 
Royce West and Judith Zaffirini. They will:

1. Study the current status of student financial assistance and tuition 
exemption/waiver programs. Identify possible criteria to be 
considered by the Legislature in evaluating such proposals and to 
establish priorities for these programs in the future.

2. Study the management, investment, and distribution of funds dedicated to 
public and higher education, including the Permanent School Fund, Available 
School Fund, Permanent University Fund, Available University Fund, and 
Higher Education Fund. The Committee should review the purpose of these 
funds and the ability of these funds to continue to meet the needs of the state.

3. Study the factors affecting undergraduate enrollment and graduation rates 
at public colleges and universities in Texas, and make recommendations for 
any necessary legislative action. The Committee should consider the costs of 
higher education and the availability of financial assistance to students; 
collaborative efforts between higher education and public education systems; 
and student recruitment and retention efforts. The Committee should also 
consider methods to effectively measure institutions' performance in meeting 
enrollment and graduation goals set by the Legislature.

4. Evaluate and, if needed, make recommendations to determine need and 
allocation of funds for higher education budget special items, medical 
schools and Texas A&M Service agencies.

Finally, another committee will study the effect on students of taking the 
TASP in high school. Members are Senators Teel Bivins (chair), Troy Fraser, 
Michael Galloway, Tom Haywood, Greg Luna, Eliot Shapleigh, and Judith Zaffirini.


June 6th

                                   AN ACT
 1-1     relating to performance evaluation of tenured faculty at certain
 1-2     institutions of higher education.
 1-3           BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 1-4           SECTION 1.  Subchapter Z, Chapter 51, Education Code, is
 1-5     amended by adding Section 51.942 to read as follows:
 1-6           Sec. 51.942.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TENURED FACULTY.
 1-7     (a)  In this section:
 1-8                 (1)  "Governing board" has the meaning assigned by
 1-9     Section 61.003.
1-10                 (2)  "Institution of higher education" means a general
1-11     academic teaching institution, medical and dental unit, or other
1-12     agency of higher education, as those terms are defined by Section
1-13     61.003.
1-14                 (3)  "Neglect of duty" means continuing or repeated
1-15     substantial neglect of professional responsibilities.
1-16           (b)  Each governing board of an institution of higher
1-17     education shall adopt rules and procedures providing for a periodic
1-18     performance evaluation process for all faculty tenured at the
1-19     institution.  The governing board may design its rules and
1-20     procedures to fit the institution's particular educational mission,
1-21     traditions, resources, and circumstances relevant to its character,
1-22     role, and scope, in addition to other relevant factors determined
1-23     by the governing board in the rules adopted pursuant to this
 2-1     section.  The governing board shall seek advice and comment from
 2-2     the faculty of the institution before adopting any rules pursuant
 2-3     to this section.  The advice and comment from the faculty on the
 2-4     performance evaluation of tenured faculty shall be given the utmost
 2-5     consideration by the governing board.
 2-6           (c)  In addition to any other provisions adopted by the
 2-7     governing board, the rules shall include provisions providing that:
 2-8                 (1)  each faculty member tenured at the institution be
 2-9     subject to a comprehensive performance evaluation process conducted
2-10     no more often than once every year, but no less often than once
2-11     every six years, after the date the faculty member was granted
2-12     tenure or received an academic promotion at the institution;
2-13                 (2)  the evaluation be based on the professional
2-14     responsibilities of the faculty member, in teaching, research,
2-15     service, patient care, and administration, and include peer review
2-16     of the faculty member;
2-17                 (3)  the process be directed toward the professional
2-18     development of the faculty member;
2-19                 (4)  the process incorporate commonly recognized
2-20     academic due process rights, including notice of the manner and
2-21     scope of the evaluation, the opportunity to provide documentation
2-22     during the evaluation process, and, before a faculty member may be
2-23     subject to disciplinary action on the basis of an evaluation
2-24     conducted pursuant to this section, notice of specific charges and
2-25     an opportunity for hearing on those charges; and
 3-1                 (5)  a faculty member be subject to revocation of
 3-2     tenure or other appropriate disciplinary action if incompetency,
 3-3     neglect of duty, or other good cause is determined to be present.
 3-4           (d)  A faculty member subject to termination on the basis of
 3-5     an evaluation conducted pursuant to this section must be given the
 3-6     opportunity for referral of the matter to a nonbinding alternative
 3-7     dispute resolution process as described in Chapter 154, Civil
 3-8     Practice and Remedies Code.  If both parties agree, another type of
 3-9     alternative dispute resolution method may be elected.  The
3-10     governing board must give specific reasons in writing for any
3-11     decision to terminate a faculty member on the basis of an
3-12     evaluation conducted pursuant to this section.
3-13           (e)  A governing board may not waive the evaluation process
3-14     for any faculty member granted tenure at an institution.
3-15           (f)  A governing board may not award tenure to an
3-16     administrator in any way that varies from the institution's general
3-17     policy on the award of tenure.
3-18           (g)  Each governing board shall file a copy of the rules
3-19     adopted pursuant to this section, and any amendments to such rules,
3-20     with the coordinating board on or before September 1 of each year.
3-21           SECTION 2.  The rules adopted by a governing board of an
3-22     institution of higher education pursuant to the provisions of this
3-23     Act shall provide for the performance evaluation of tenured faculty
3-24     not later than January 1, 2004, of each faculty member tenured at
3-25     the institution as of the effective date of this Act.
                                                                S.B. No. 149
 4-1           SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect January 1, 1998.
 4-2           SECTION 4.  The importance of this legislation and the
 4-3     crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
 4-4     emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
 4-5     constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
 4-6     days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended.
         

March 7, 1997

Austin American-Statesman
Letter to the Editor
Fax: 445-3679


Two seperate items in the March 7 Austin American-Statesman are related. Lt. Governor Bob Bullock quotes the Chinese proverb, "Talk doesn't cook rice," and UT-Austin President Robert Berdahl accepts an out-of-state job in small or large part because "(Texas higher education) will require substantially better financial support from the State of Texas."

Legislators are fond of saying that education is the most important job of state government. Meanwhile, faculty salaries are increasingly uncompetitive, benefits are being reduced and tenure is challenged. During the next few years, many Texas faculty members will be retiring while enrollments are projected to explode. Who will prepare the next generation of the Texas workforce? Texas universities are finding it increasingly difficult to recruit quality faculty members and are being forced to turn to less qualified part- time faculty.

President Berdahl's decision to act on his convictions may be an important element of his legacy.
Sincerely,

Paul Reed
President
Huntsville, Texas
409-294-1281


NEWS RELEASE



October 24, 1996
Chuck Hempstead
Release Immediately
512-873-7404

Faculty Group Cautious About
"Post-Tenure Review"


The Texas Association of College Teachers (TACT) adjourned its Annual Fall Conference October 19 in Austin with a five-point position paper on a controversial legislative proposal called "post-tenure review."

TACT President Paul Reed summed up the position after the Conference. "Like many proposed laws, we agree with the legislative intent -- in this case faculty accountability -- but we are concerned that the implementation is problematic," he said. "The term post-tenure review is a misnomer, because faculty are already reviewed, and processes exist to improve the performance of underperforming faculty members." Reed teaches management at Sam Houston State University in Huntsville.

"We certainly don't want poor teachers in the classroom, and if these new programs are to identify substandard performers and develop their skills, I am all for it. But if this exercise is intended to scare people by threatening their jobs or revoking their tenure and academic freedom, then I predict that the legislative intent will backfire. That is why we prefer to call any new initiative along these lines "faculty development." Obviously, if development efforts don't succeed, that faculty member should find a different profession in which to succeed."

"Most importantly," Reed concluded, "the tenure protections for academic freedom, political incorrectness, artistic expression and experimentation have served society too well to be abandoned. Let's encourage faculty improvement but not encourage them to take the safe route at the expense of innovation."



--- 30 ---


September 17, 1996

Dear Editor:

The Texas Association of College Teachers shares the concern of many Texas faculty members regarding current discussions called "post-tenure review." Unfortunately, the positive concept of personnel performance review and enhancement is being confused with issues of academic freedom and a misconception that tenure guarantees lifetime employment.

Texas universities should and do regularly review all faculty members. Procedures exist for dismissing incompetent personnel. If a more systematic, documented approach is needed to identify and initiate action against the proverbial "deadwood," this exercise is worthwhile. The mistake is in threatening tenure revocation, as if academic freedom can be withheld after it is earned, and as if such revocation is tantamount to probation. We urge great caution in designing any new accountability program which cheapens or redefines tenure. Eliminating such references from the entire discussion would be a positive beginning.

Sincerely,

Chuck Hempstead
Executive Director
Texas Association of College Teachers
9513 Burnet Road, Suite 206
Austin, Texas 78758
(512) 873-7404